Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Kelly v. Montgomery Real Estate Buyers LLC et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00297
Defendant:
Bobby Dean, Jessica Avant and Montgomery Real Estate Buyers LLC
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00276
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01079
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Russ Rare Coin Inc. et al
as 2:2019mc03899
Defendant:
Rust Rare Coin Inc., Denise Gunderson Rust, Joshua Daniel Rust and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission and State of Utah Division of Securities
Not Yet Classified:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
People's United Equipment Finance Corporation v. Freeman
as 2:2018mc00813
Plaintiff:
People's United Equipment Finance Corporation
Defendant:
Ricky Dean Freeman
Peoples United Equipment Finance Corp v. Morris
as 2:2018mc00518
Plaintiff:
Peoples United Equipment Finance Corp
Defendant:
Lenn Waters Morris and Ricky Dean Freeman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Anderson et al v. DIRECTV, LLC et al
as 2:2016mc01490
Plaintiff:
Sefton Anderson , Christopher Barnhart , Dean Bourn and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV LLC, Directv, Inc and Mastec North America, Inc.
Respondent:
Advanced Cable and Satellite LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
