Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Johnson v. Doordash, Inc.,
as 3:2024cv06449
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Johnson
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Omnity Consulting, LLC v. Doordash, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Omnity Consulting, LLC dba Harlem Shake (West 124th Street) and Omnity Consulting, LLC individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Harlem Shake (West 124th Street)
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1361
Karout v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2023cv06148
Plaintiff:
Sharbell Karout
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rodgers et al v. Doordash Inc
as 3:2023cv05564
Plaintiff:
LaVonne Rodgers and Wesley Rodgers
Defendant:
Doordash Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-522
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc., Postmates Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats
Defendant / Appellant:
Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae:
United States Chamber of Commerce
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-521
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats and Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae:
United States Chamber of Commerce
Lendenbaum v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lendenbaum
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Binbek v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03729
Plaintiff:
Asha Binbek
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Davitashvili et al v. Grubhub Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03000
Defendant:
Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., DoorDash Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mia Sapienza, Adam Bensimon and Mariam Davitashvili
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Philip Eliades, Jonathan Swaby, John Boisi and others
Not Classified By Court:
Cheeseboat Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
