Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mario Alvarez-Cartaya v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60422
Petitioner:
MARIO ENRIQUE ALVAREZ-CARTAYA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos Perea v. Editorial Cultural, Inc.
as 19-2129
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ENRIQUE ALVAREZ LAGUERRE, BEATRIZ LAGUERRE SAAVEDRA, BEATRIZ ALEXIA ALVAREZ LAGUERRE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO RAMOS PEREA
Defendant / Appellee:
EDITORIAL CULTURAL, INC.
Laguerre Saavedra, et al v. Editorial Cultural, Inc.
as 19-2119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RAFAEL ENRIQUE ALVAREZ LAGUERRE, ROBERTO RAMOS PEREA, BEATRIZ LAGUERRE SAAVEDRA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
EDITORIAL CULTURAL, INC.
Julio Alvarez Vasquez v. William Barr
as 19-70675
Petitioner:
JULIO ENRIQUE ALVAREZ VASQUEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Enrique Alvarez-Gallo v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71243
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE ALVAREZ-GALLO
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
USA v. Enrique Bahena
as 17-50227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
ENRIQUE ALVAREZ BAHENA, AKA Enrique Bahana, AKA Enrique Bahena, AKA Enrique Behena, AKA Enrique Behenne
Kronoz Internacional, S.A. de C.V. v. Alvarez et al
as 2:2017cv02261
Defendant:
Enrique Alvarez, Kronoz US, LLC, OA Ventures, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kronoz Internacional, S.A. de C.V.
Kronoz Internacional, S.A. de C.V. v. Alvarez et al
as 2:2017mc00017
Defendant:
Enrique Alvarez, Kronoz US, LLC, OA Ventures, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kronoz Internacional, S.A. de C.V.
USA v. Jesus Alvarez-Villa
as 13-10542
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS ENRIQUE ALVAREZ-VILLA
Mulato v. WMC Mortgage Corp. et al
as 4:2009cv03443
Plaintiff:
Vincenta Mulato
Defendant:
WMC Mortgage Corp., Litton Loan Servicing LP, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
