Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Luis Lopez-Munoz v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-2435
Petitioner:
LUIS F. LOPEZ-MUNOZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Quintanilla-Dominguez
as 22-1198
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL QUINTANILLA-DOMINGUEZ, AKA Luis F. Lopez-Montez, AKA Cesar Rodriguez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Francis Grandinetti, II v. Max Otani, et al
as 21-15593
Defendant / Appellee:
JODIE MAESAKA-HIRATA, ALL PUBLIC SAFETY-HI DIRECTORS, STATE OF HAWAII and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Robert Taylor v. USDC-CASD
as 19-70716
Undetermined:
AVILES, Officer, F. LOPEZ, Officer and DANAL, Officer
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Petitioner:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Other:
In re: ROBERT TAYLOR
In re: Stephen Lopez v. Vladimir Raicevic, et al
as 17-60018
Debtor:
In re: STEPHEN F. LOPEZ
Appellant:
STEPHEN F. LOPEZ
Appellee:
VLADIMIR RAICEVIC, Trustee and IMELDA RAICEVIC
USA v. Efrain Lopez-Flore
as 15-20676
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EFRAIN LOPEZ-FLORES, also known as Efrain Flores Lopez, also known as Efrain Lopez Flores, also known as Efrain F. Lopez, also known as Efrain Flores, also known as Efrain Lopez
Elder Lopez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-70792
Petitioner:
ELDER F. LOPEZ, AKA Elder Feliciano Lopez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
