Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Howard v. Fye, et al.
as 24-146
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL HOWARD
Defendant / Appellant:
KEN FYE
Defendant / Appellee:
T. BAILEY, SPARKS POLICE DEPARTMENT, terminated per #3 Order, WASHOE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, terminated per #3 Order and others
Charles Capp, et al v. KushCo Holdings, Inc., et al
as 20-56321
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS KOVACEVICH, CHRISTOPHER TEDFORD, KUSHCO HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES CAPP, MUN FYE CHANG and RICHARD DIAMOND, Lead plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Braja Smith v. Fye, et al
as 20-14191
Defendant / Appellee:
FYE, MD, Chief Physician at Macon State Prison, MACON SP WARDEN and CLARENCE KEGLER, Unit Manager, Macon State Prison
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRAJA SMITH
Robert Clark v. Chiquita Fye, et al
as 20-11020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT L. CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIQUITA A. FYE, in her official and individual capacity as Medical Director of Macon State Prison and GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, Macon State Prison
Mark-Alonzo Williams v. John Wetzel, et al
as 20-1337
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MAHALLY, SUPERINTENDENT, SCI DALLAS, JOSEPH ZAKARAUSKAS, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT, SCI DALLAS, JOHN WETZEL, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK-ALONZO WILLIAMS
David FyeIn re: David Fye
as 19-41038
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID JOHN FYE, also known as Russ Scharpenter
Robert Clark v. Chiquita Fye, et al
as 19-12928
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT L. CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIQUITA A. FYE, in her official and individual capacity as Medical Director of Macon State Prison and GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, Macon State Prison
Joe W. May v. KushCo Holdings, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00798
Defendant:
Christopher Tedford, KushCo Holdings, Inc., Nicholas Kovacevich and others
Plaintiff:
Joe W. May
Petitioner:
Gower Golding, Mun Fye Chang, Richard Diamond and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
