Cases 1 - 10 of 245
United States of America v. Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co
as 21-2117
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel CKD Project, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CKD Project, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGAA, Fresenius Medical Care Holding, Inc., DBA Fresenius Medical Care North America, New York Dialysis Services, Inc. and others
Fresenius Medical Care Holding v. No. 1 Chinese Restaurant
as 20-1843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Fresenius Medical Care North America
Defendant:
TOWN OF LILLINGTON and RESTORATION & RECONSTRUCTION, INC., d/b/a ServPro of SW Raleigh/ Cary/ SW Wake Co., d/b/a ServPro of Raleigh/ Garner/ Zebulon
Defendant / Appellee:
NO. 1 CHINESE RESTAURANT
Fresenius Medical Care Orange County, LLC et al v. Xavier Becerra et al
as 8:2019cv02130
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Sonia Angell, Shelley Rouillard and others
Plaintiff:
Fresenius Medical Care Orange County, LLC, U.S. Renal Care, Inc., DaVita Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
California State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and California Medical Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Connie Hannah, et al v. Fresenius USA Manufacturing, et al
as 19-6209
Plaintiff:
CONNIE HANNAH and LATOYA COSBY
Defendant / Appellee:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., aka Fresenius Medical Care North America
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS JEFFERSON, ROSEMARY WEBSTER and TIMOTHY WAIRE, JR.
Defendant:
NATIONAL MEDICAL CARE, INC., aka Fresenius Medical Care North America and FRESENIUS USA MANUFACTURING, INC., aka Fresenius Medical Care North America
Connie Hannah, et al v. Fresenius USA Manufacturing, et al
as 19-5149
Plaintiff:
CONNIE HANNAH and LATOYA COSBY
Defendant / Appellee:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., aka Fresenius Medical Care North America
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS JEFFERSON, ROSEMARY WEBSTER and TIMOTHY WAIRE, JR.
Defendant:
NATIONAL MEDICAL CARE, INC., aka Fresenius Medical Care North America and FRESENIUS USA MANUFACTURING, INC., aka Fresenius Medical Care North America
The United States Of America et al vs Bayer Diagnostics Corp.
as 1:2011cv00181
Defendant:
Bayer Diagnostics Corp, Davita Inc., Dva Laboratories Services and others
Relator:
Rey C. Patricia
Plaintiff:
The Common Wealth Of Massachusetts, The Commonwealth Of Virginia, The District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Beard et al v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as TXS/4:16-cv-03060
Plaintiff:
Alexia Beard and Estate of Alexieus K. Beard, Deceased
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. D/B/A Fresenius Medical Care North America , Fresenius USA, Inc. and others
Yolanda Gonzales, et al v. Fresenius Medical Care Holding, et al
as 16-80135
Respondent:
YOLANDA GONZALES and ALBERTO MUNGUIA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, a New York corporation, DBA Fresenius Medical Care North America, FRESENIUS VASCULAR CARE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, AMERICAN ACCESS CARE OF SAN DIEGO, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and others
Yolanda Gonzales, et al v. Fresenius Medical Care Holding, et al
as 16-80135
Plaintiff - Respondent:
YOLANDA GONZALES and ALBERTO MUNGUIA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Petitioner:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, a New York corporation, DBA Fresenius Medical Care North America, FRESENIUS VASCULAR CARE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, AMERICAN ACCESS CARE OF SAN DIEGO, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and others
Jefferson v. Fresenius Medical Care Pharmacy Services Inc et al
as MA/1:16-cv-11223
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jefferson
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Pharmacy Services Inc, Fresenius Medical Care North America Inc., Fresenius USA Marketing , Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
