Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Gary Cooper v. Frank Bishop
as 21-6291
Petitioner / Appellant:
GARY COOPER
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND and FRANK BISHOP, NBCI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv21802
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Cooper
as 8:2017mc00729
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Gary Cooper
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
USA v. Gary Cooper
as 17-3015
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Gary Cooper
Tarango et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as CAN/4:13-cv-03070
Plaintiff:
Carlos Tarango , Gregory Adams , Mary Barksdale and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and McKesson Corporation
Syrek et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as CAC/8:13-cv-00987
Plaintiff:
John Syrek , Gregory Adams , Shirley McCoy and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and McKesson Corporation
Peter Gakuba v. Charles O'Brien, et al
as 13-1929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES O'BRIEN, #3914, Illinois State Police Sergeant, MICHAEL EASTON, #3607, Master Sergeant, Illinois State Police, DANIEL BAISLEY, #4586, Illinois State Police detective and others
Peter Gakuba v. Charles O'Brien, et al
as 12-3345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES O'BRIEN, #3914, Illinois State Police sgt., MICHAEL EASTON, #3607, master sgt., ISP, DANIEL BAISLEY, #4586, ISP detective and others
Gakuba v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2012cv07296
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
Charles O'Brien, Michael Easton, Daniel Baisley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gary Cooper v. Diane Reed, et al
as 11-10009
Debtor:
In the Matter of: GARY R. COOPER and JUNANNE M. COOPER
Appellant:
GARY COOPER
Appellee:
DIANE G REED, Chapter 7 Trustee and CADLE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
