Cases 1 - 10 of 90
GARIBAY v. SELECT HOME WARRANTY LLC
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GARIBAY
Defendant:
SELECT HOME WARRANTY LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Booker v. Lee, et al.
as 23-3640
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD E. BOOKER
Defendant / Appellee:
D. LEE, Sergeant, J. GARIBAY, Correctional Officer, R. CASTELLANOS, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Garibay Melendez v. Garland
as 23-1186
Petitioner:
JAVIER GARIBAY MELENDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Tacos El Chaparro Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Tacos El Chaparro Inc. d/b/a Tacos El Chaparro, Jesus Lenin Grajeda-Garibay, Favio R. Grageda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Javier Mendoza
as 22-50079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAVIER GARIBAY MENDOZA, AKA Javier Garibay Mendoza-Romero, AKA Jose Mendoza-Romero
Garibay Garcia v. Garland
as 21-1123
Petitioner:
LAURA GARIBAY GARCIA, ANGELA MAIRCELLA MENDOZA GARIBAY and SERGIO MENDOZA GARIBAY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Garibay
as 21-11026
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Raymundo Gonzalez Garibay
James Sams v. USDC-CARIV
as 21-71167
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JAMES PLAS SAMS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CHELSEA ARMENTA, Custody Appeals Representative and others
Petitioner:
JAMES PLAS SAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
