Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mehrotra v. United States Department of Labor
as 23-7798
Petitioner:
SHASHI MEHROTRA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GE POWER and others
Aenergy, S.A. v. Republic of Angola
as 21-1752
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Aenergy, S.A. and Combined Cycle Power Plant Soyo, S.A.
Defendant / Appellee:
Republic of Angola, Ministry of Energy and Water of the Republic of Angola, Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Angola and others
Aenergy, S.A. v. Republic of Angola
as 21-1510
Defendant / Appellee:
General Electric International, Inc., Empresa Publica De Producao De Electricidade, EP, Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Angola and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Aenergy, S.A. and Combined Cycle Power Plant Soyo, S.A.
Aenergy, S.A. et al v. Republic of Angola et al
as 1:2020cv03569
Defendant:
Empresa Nacional De Distribuicao De Electricidade, General Electric Company, Ministry of Energy and Water of the Republic of Angola and others
Plaintiff:
Combined Cycle Power Plant Soyo, S.A. and Aenergy, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
General Electric Company et al v. Uptake Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv08267
Plaintiff:
General Electric International, Inc. and General Electric Company
Defendant:
Kelly McGinnis, Ganesh Bell, Ravi Marwaha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
General Electric Company v. Aaron Massow
as 2:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
General Electric Company and General Electric International, Inc.
Defendant:
Aaron Massow
Cause Of Action: Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
General Electric International, Inc. v. Nucoastal Power Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv02668
Plaintiff:
General Electric International, Inc. and General Electric International, Inc.
Defendant:
Renu Power, LLC and ReNu Power Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
