Cases 1 - 10 of 17
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02516
Defendant:
Teva Women's Health, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
In Re:
Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Pirelli Armstrong Retiree Medical Benefits Trust, Operating Engineers Local 312 Health and Welfare Trust, A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Buildings Trade Welfare Plan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company
Claimant:
Lonny DiTella
Interested Party:
Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc., PAR Pharmaceutical, Inc., Aetna Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Generic Pharmaceutical Association
Cause Of Action: MDL 2516 In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America et al v. King County, Washington
as 2:2013cv02151
Plaintiff:
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America , Generic Pharmaceutical Association , Biotechnology Industry Organization and others
Defendant:
King County, Washington , King County Department of Public Health and Director of the King County Department of Public Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
NOVO NORDISK V CARACO PHARMA
as 10-1001
Amicus Curiae:
Apotex Inc., Consumer Federation of America, Generic Pharmaceutical Association and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk, Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S and others
Novo Nordisk, Inc:
, , and others
THERASENSE V BECTON
as 08-1511
Amicus Curiae:
1st Media, LLC, Acacia Research Corporation, Alejandro Martinez and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Abbott Laboratories and TheraSense, Inc. (n/k/a Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.)
Defendant-Appellee:
Bayer HealthCare LLC, Becton, Dickinson and Company and Nova Biomedical Corporation
ABBOTT LABS V SANDOZ
as 07-1300
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Abbott Laboratories
Amicus Curiae:
Apotex, Inc., Generic Pharmaceutical Association, Patients not Patents, Inc. and others
Generic Pharmaceutical Association:
Defendant-Appellant:
Sandoz, Inc.
AVENTIS PHARMA SA V AMPHASTAR PHARM
as 07-1280
Amicus Curiae:
3M Company, Biotechnology Industry Organization, Caterpillar Inc. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Aventis Pharma S.A. and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
TAKEDA CHEMICAL V MYLAN LABS
as 07-1269
Defendant-Appellant:
Alphapharm Pty. Ltd., Genpharm, Inc., Mylan Laboratories, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Generic Pharmaceutical Association
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. and Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.
SANOFI-SYNTHELABO V APOTEX
as 06-1613
Defendant-Appellant:
Apotex Corp. and Apotex, Inc.
Apotex, Inc:
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Holding Partners, Sanofi-Synthelabo and Sanofi-Synthelabo, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Generic Pharmaceutical Association, Medco Health Solutions, Inc. and Patients not Patents, Inc.
Ranbaxy Labs Ltd, et al v. Leavitt, Michael O., et al
as 06-5154
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Ranbaxy Inc, Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael O. Leavitt, Secretary of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Food & Drug Administration and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Blue Cross & Blue Shield Associations, Inc.
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Generic Pharmaceutical Association
PFIZER V APOTEX
as 06-1261
Defendant-Appellant:
Apotex, Inc. (formerly known as TorPharm, Inc.), Apotex, Inc. (formerly known as TorPharm, Inc.) and Apotex, Inc. (formerly known as TorPharm, Inc.)
Amicus Curiae:
Biotechnology Industry Organization, Eli Lilly & Company, Generic Pharmaceutical Association and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Pfizer, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and Pfizer, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
