Cases 1 - 10 of 154
Lodhi v. Dameron et al
as 8:2023cv02282
Plaintiff:
Saad Usman Lodhi
Defendant:
Treymane Dameron, Kimberly Hobson, David Robinson and others
Lodhi v. Hobson et al
as 1:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Saad Usman Lodhi
Defendant:
Kimberly Hobson, A. David Robinson, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question
Joseph Locklear, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7732
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH LEE LOCKLEAR, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Khalil Kimbrough v. Kevin Hudson
as 21-7713
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KHALIL J. KIMBROUGH
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN HUDSON, Superintendent, HAROLD CLARKE, Director of DOC, NURSE MEADE, Director of the Medical Staff and others
Thomas Moyler, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7653
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS MOYLER, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections
Johnnie Jones, Jr. v. Karen Brown
as 21-7649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNIE NELL JONES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN BROWN, Chairwoman, Virginia Department of Corrections, HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, DOE #1, Parole Board Member, in their individual capacity and others
Troy Minter v. Adrianne Bennett
as 21-7618
Petitioner / Appellant:
TROY XAVIER MINTER
Respondent / Appellee:
ADRIANNE BENNETT, VA. Parole Board Chairman and HAROLD CLARKE, VA. Department of Corrections
Shawn Echols v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN ECHOLS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VADOC and CARL MANIS
Timothy Bolden v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7533
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY BOLDEN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Mark Lowe v. David Hamlett
as 21-7527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK MADISON LOWE
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID HAMLETT, Chief of Security and HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
