Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Conry, et al v. Gerber Products Company, et al
as 3:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Thomas Conry, Kelsey Daker, Hailey Ronayne and others
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company, Perrigo Company PLC, L. Perrigo Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Hicks v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Hailey Hicks
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hailey-Giannetti v. O'Malley
as 24-252
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL HAILEY-GIANNETTI
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
USA v. Hailey Gist-Holden
as 23-1755
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HAILEY GIST-HOLDEN
USA v. Hailey Gist-Holden
as 23-1704
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HAILEY GIST-HOLDEN
Finan et al v. Lafarge S.A. et al
as 1:2022cv07831
Plaintiff:
Chariss Finan, Gloria Finan-Bacon, Shawn Bacon and others
Defendant:
Lafarge S.A. and Lafarge Cement Syria S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Steffen et al v. National Center for Manufacturing Sciences, Inc.
as 2:2022cv12698
Plaintiff:
Paula Steffen and Hailey Steffen
Defendant:
National Center for Manufacturing Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Roderick Washington v. USDC-CALA, et alIn re: Roderick Washington v. USDC-CALA, et al
as 22-70221
Not Classified By Court:
In re: RODERICK WASHINGTON, ALEX VILLANUEVA, J. HOHN, individual capacity and others
Petitioner:
RODERICK WASHINGTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Hailey Gist-Holden v. Philip P. Simon
as 22-2264
Petitioner:
HAILEY GIST-HOLDEN
Respondent:
PHILIP P. SIMON
Akers et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00760
Plaintiff:
Delbert Akers, Mark Alcorn, Lori Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
