Cases 1 - 10 of 309
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stacia Hall, et al v. District of Columbia Board of Elections
as 24-7065
Plaintiff:
Stacia Hall, Ralph Chittams, Suzzanne Keller and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia Board of Elections
Stacia Hall, et al v. District of Columbia Board of Elections
as 24-7050
Plaintiff:
Stacia Hall, Ralph Chittams, Suzzanne Keller and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia Board of Elections
Ayers v. Shashua et al
as 1:2024cv02791
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ayers
Defendant:
Amnon Shashua, Eyal Desheh, Patrick P. Gelsinger and others
Le v. Mobileye Global Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01390
Plaintiff:
Tung Le
Defendant:
Mobileye Global Inc., Amnon Shashua, Moran Shemesh Rojansky and others
McAuliffe v. Mobileye Global Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
John McAuliffe
Defendant:
Mobileye Global Inc., Amnon Shashua, Moran Shemesh Rojansky and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JENKE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02950
Plaintiff:
ESTHER JENKE, JANE RACHEL HELLER, NINA NELSON and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
SUN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02710
Plaintiff:
YING SUN and PENG LIU
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN and LISA K. HELLER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CHENG et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02602
Plaintiff:
JIAN YI CHENG, XING CHEN, HOURASA SEIRAFITEHRANIAN and others
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
