Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Walker v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-1806
Plaintiff: EMMANUEL WALKER, as Guardian of an incapacitated adult on behalf of Issac Contreras
Defendant: STATE OF ARIZONA, AARON BOWEN, UNKNOWN BOWEN, husband and wife and others
Dominguez-Guaraca v. Garland
as 24-93
Petitioner: MANUEL ISSAC DOMINGUEZ-GUARACA, SCARLET VALENTINA DOMINGUEZ-VASQUEZ and TANIA CAROLINA VASQUEZ-MOROCHO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24815
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Betschart, et al. v. Garrett, et al.
as 23-3573
Petitioner: WALTER BETSCHART, JOSHUA SHANE BARTLETT, CALEB AIONA and others
Respondent: PATRICK GARRETT, SHERIFF, Washington County Sheriff, in his official capacity and STATE OF OREGON
Morales Pita v. Garland
as 23-2030
Petitioner: ISSAC MORALES PITA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00727
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bey v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff: Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant: Bennie Thompson, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
United States of America v. Fletcher
as 22-2994
Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: Jeng Dawda
Defendant / Appellant: Issac Fletcher, AKA Sealed Defendant 7, AKA Sealed Defendant 1
Helo v. Sema4 Holdings Corp. et al
as 3:2022cv01131
Plaintiff: Nabil Helo
Defendant: Sema4 Holdings, Corp., Eric Schadt, Katherine Stueland and others
Issac v. Garland
as 22-1234
Petitioner: SALAM POULOS ISSAC
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?