Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Picha et al v. Gemini Trust Company, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10922
Plaintiff:
Brendan Picha and Max J. Hastings
Defendant:
Gemini Trust Company, LLC, Tyler Winklevoss and Cameron Winklevoss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Orso v. Disner et al
as 1:2021mc20245
Plaintiff:
Matthew Orso as successor trustee to Kenneth D. Bell in his capacity as court-appointed receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com
Defendant:
Hugh J. Hastings
Wagner v. Proteon Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02343
Defendant:
ArTara Therapeutics, Inc., Garen Bohlin, Paul J. Hastings and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Wagner
Lanteigne v. Proteon Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv12436
Defendant:
Garen Bohlin, Paul J Hastings, Artara Therapeutics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Neil Lanteigne
Teow v. Proteon Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06745
Defendant:
Paul J. Hastings, Garen Bohlin, ArTara Therapeutics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Teow
Plumley v. Proteon Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02143
Defendant:
ArTara Therapeutics, Inc., Garen Bohlin, Paul J. Hastings and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Morgan v. Relypsa, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv04800
Plaintiff:
James Morgan
Defendant:
Relypsa, Inc., Daniel K. Spiegelman, John P. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Zavolas v. Relypsa, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv04735
Plaintiff:
John Zavolas
Defendant:
Relypsa, Inc., Daniel K. Spiegelman, John A. Orwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edelman v. Relypsa, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv04702
Plaintiff:
Alan S Edelman
Defendant:
Relypsa, Inc., Daniel K. Spiegelman, John P. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Morales v. Relypsa, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv04684
Plaintiff:
Servando Morales
Defendant:
Relypsa, Inc., Daniel K. Spiegelman, John P. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
