Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
James BondIn re: James Bond
as 22-12892
Petitioner: In re: JAMES LOUIS BOND
Respondent: USA
James BondIn re: James Bond
as 22-11869
Petitioner: In re: JAMES LOUIS BOND
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In the Matter of James Louis Parks Jr. - #202571
as 3:2017mc80155
Respondent: James Louis Parks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 17-5125
Plaintiff - Appellee: Elouise Pepion Cobell, Thomas Maulson, James Louis Larose and others
Defendant - Appellee: Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, Michael Black, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs and Steven T. Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury
Intervenor - Appellant: Mark Kester Brown
Intervenor - Appellee: Native American Rights Fund and Osage Nation
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 17-5111
Plaintiff - Appellant: Elouise Pepion Cobell, Thomas Maulson, James Louis Larose and others
Defendant - Appellee: Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, Michael Black, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs and Steven T. Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury
US v. James Townsend We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-4024
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES LOUIS TOWNSEND
Praise Deliverance Church v. National Loan Investors, LP et al
as 4:2016mc01394
Plaintiff: Praise Deliverance Church
Defendant: National Loan Investors, LP, James Louis Hordern, Jr, Jean Jabbour and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
In Re: James Whittlesey
as 16-9380
Movant: In re: JAMES LOUIS WHITTLESEY, a/k/a William Joseph Downs, a/k/a Frank Wayne Pehringer
:
In re: James Bond
as 16-13628
Petitioner: In re: JAMES LOUIS BOND
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: James Bond
as 16-13000
Petitioner: In re: JAMES LOUIS BOND
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?