Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Taylor v. Jack In The Box, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00612
Plaintiff:
Yaman F. Taylor
Defendant:
Jack In The Box, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Judy Szwanek, et al v. Jack in the Box, Inc., et al
as 20-16942
Defendant / Appellee:
DIFFERENT RULES, LLC, ARGO HOSPITALITY SERVICES, INC., THREE POWERS FOODS, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUDY SZWANEK and JAMES LOPEZ II, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Jessica Gessele, et al v. Jack in the Box, Inc.
as 20-80096
Petitioner:
CHRISTINA MAULDIN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, TRICIA TETRAULT, NICOLE GESSELE and others
Respondent:
JACK IN THE BOX, INC., a Delaware Corporation
Popov v. Jack in the Box, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00485
Plaintiff:
Igor Popov
Defendant:
Jack in the Box, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Accor Management US Inc. et al v. Visa Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04616
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros. Home Entertainment Inc., Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., Accor Hotels & Resorts (Maryland) LLC and others
Defendant:
Mastercard Incorporated, Visa International Service Association, Mastercard International Incorporated and others
Special Master:
James Orenstein
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Accor Management US Inc. et al v. Visa Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv04188
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros. Home Entertainment Inc., Accor Hotels & Resorts (Maryland) LLC, Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Visa Inc., MasterCard Incorporated, Visa International Service Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Patricia Sue Williams v. 6409 Sunset LLC et al
as 2:2017cv08747
Defendant:
6409 Sunset LLC, DOES and Jack in the Box, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Sue Williams
Montgomery v. Admin Rev Bd
as 08-60716
Petitioner:
MARK MONTGOMERY
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, UNITED STATES DEPT OF LABOR
Intervenor:
JACK IN THE BOX INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
