Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Harris v. US
as 24-1007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LA VELL HARRIS, aka Smiley James Harris
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Fenner et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2017cv11661
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, General Motors LLC and Robert Bosch LLC
Plaintiff:
Andrei Fenner, Joshua Herman, Anthony Gadecki and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Carrie Mizell, Matt Henderson, George Stanley and others
Petitioner:
Trifecta Performance Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. James Harris
as 23-2421
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES HARRIS, also known as Tyrell
James Rand v. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer
as 23-2128
Petitioner:
JAMES HARRY RAND
Respondent:
REBECCA R. PALLMEYER
HARRIS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
JAMES LA VELL HARRIS and SMILEY JAMES HARRIS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
James Rand v. Rebecca Pallmeyer
as 23-1377
Petitioner:
JAMES HARRY RAND
Respondent:
REBECCA R. PALLMEYER
In re: Eddie Harris
as 22-13927
Petitioner:
In re: EDDIE JAMES HARRIS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
USA v. Thomas James Harris
as 22-11517
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS JAMES HARRIS
Alex Nelson, et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al
as 21-3740
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alex Nelson and Iris Nelson
Defendant / Appellant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Gerald Leyshock, COI, in his individual and official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities, Charlene Deeken and John Does, 1-3
Willie Harris v. Pietrzyk, et al
as 21-2955
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE JAMES HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
PRISON COUNSELOR PIETRZYK, RESIDENT UNIT MANAGER OVERSMITH, [UNKNOWN] BRONOLD, Qualified Mental Health Professional and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
