Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lana Renna, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 23-55367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LANA RAE RENNA, DANIELLE JAYMES, HANNAH SPOUSTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her official capacity as Director of Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE STATES OF COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, and RHODE ISLAND, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY and others
USA v. Jaymes Gaddis, III
as 23-3173
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAYMES E. GADDIS, III
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. The Tabor Store, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
The Tabor Store, LLC d/b/a The Tabor Store, Jayme E. Smith, Alan L. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ahlum et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00773
Plaintiff:
Ahlum, Lauren Whitmore, George Ahlum and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Thomas Piekarski v. AFSCME, et al
as 21-2687
Plaintiff:
Jayme Prokes and Randall C. Eason
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas P. Piekarski, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council No. 5, as representative of the class of all chapters and affiliates of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council No. 5
Defendant:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council No. 5, Local 2440, as representative of the class of all chapters and affiliates of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council No. 5, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council No. 5, Local 221, as representatives of the class of all chapters and affiliates of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council No. 5
Peter Thoreson v. Sawyer County, Wisconsin, et al
as 21-1437
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PETER J. THORESON
Defendant / Appellant:
JAYMES POPLIN, investigator, individually and in his official capacity, KEVIN GILLIS, Deputy, indidivually and in his official capacity and SAWYER COUNTY, WISCONSIN
Thomas Piekarski v. AFSCME, Council No. 5
as 21-1372
Defendant:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council No. 5, Local 2440, as representative of the class of all chapters and affiliates of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council No. 5 and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council No. 5, Local 221, as representatives of the class of all chapters and affiliates of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council No. 5
Plaintiff:
Randall C. Eason and Jayme Prokes
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas P. Piekarski, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council No. 5, as representative of the class of all chapters and affiliates of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council No. 5
Renna et al v Becerra et al
as 3:2020cv02190
Plaintiff:
Laura Schwartz, Danielle Jaymes, Darin Prince and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Luis Lopez and Robert Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
