Cases 1 - 10 of 16
BARTH v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv02920
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. BARTH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and HOMELAND SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
BARTH v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv02778
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. BARTH
Not Classified By Court:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
John Barth v. DOJ, et al
as 22-5338
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John S. Barth
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Homeland Security Investigations
BARTH v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2022cv00955
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. BARTH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPT. OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUR. OF INVESTIGATION, HOMELAND SEC. INVESTIGATIONS. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
John Barth v. United States, et al
as 22-5007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John S. Barth
Defendant / Appellee:
United States, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Barth v. Town of Waterboro, et al
as 21-1513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN S. BARTH
Defendant / Appellee:
WATERBORO, ME, GARY LAMB, JONATHAN WILLIAM BROGAN and others
Barth v. Mabry Carlton Ranch, Inc et al
as 5:2020cv09288
Defendant:
Longino Ranch, Inc., Mabry Carlton Ranch, Inc, Eric Sutton and others
Plaintiff:
John S Barth and John Barth
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Barth v. Buckley, et al
as 20-1242
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM J. BUCKLEY, MARIANNE B. BOWLER, JASON PANOS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN S. BARTH
Barth v. City of Peabody
as 19-1643
Defendant:
RICHARD DIPIETRO and RK REALTY TRUST
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN S. BARTH
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PEABODY
BARTH v. USA
as 1:2017cv01037
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.