Cases 1 - 10 of 14
USA v. Luna
as 22-40793
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Luna
Westfall v. Luna
as 21-10159
Defendant / Appellee:
Jose Luna, Southlake Police Department Officer, In His Individual Capacity, Venessa Trevino, Southlake Police Department Officer, In Her Individual Capacity, Nathaniel Anderson, Southlake Police Department Officer, In His Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Constance Westfall
Juan Santana Luna v. William Barr
as 20-72347
Petitioner:
JUAN SANTANA LUNA, AKA Juan Jose Luna
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Rodrigo Diaz-Nava v. William Barr
as 20-72160
Petitioner:
RODRIGO NOEL DIAZ-NAVA, AKA Jose Luna-Nava
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Rodrigo Diaz-Nava v. William Barr
as 20-70414
Petitioner:
RODRIGO NOEL DIAZ-NAVA, AKA Jose Luna-Nava
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Martinez v. Barr
as 19-1713
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Luis Eduardo Martinez, AKA Jose Arturo Gallegos-Chavez, AKA Luis Martinez-Raymundo, AKA Jose Luna Ramirez
USA v. Jose Luna-Martinez
as 17-10878
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUNA-MARTINEZ
Carrillo Luna v. Luna Luna et al
as 3:2017cv01992
Respondent:
Juan Jose Luna Luna and Maria Consuelo Luna Luna
Petitioner:
Laura Magdiel Carrillo Luna
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 9001
USA v. Jose Ortiz-Castro
as 16-41725
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE OSCAR ORTIZ-CASTRO, also known as Jose Oscar Castro Ortiz, also known as Oscar Ortiz, also known as Miguel Aguilar, also known as Sponto Moniker, also known as Oscar Jose Luna
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Neves et al
as 1:2012cv23131
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Fabrizio Neves and Jose Luna
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
