Cases 1 - 10 of 58
US v. Rivera-Lopez
as 24-1400
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JUAN GABRIEL RIVERA-LOPEZ
US v. Rivera-Lopez
as 22-1819
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN GABRIEL RIVERA-LOPEZ
Sanchez-Rivera v. Garland
as 22-1154
Petitioner:
JUAN SANCHEZ-RIVERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
NLRB v. Empresas Velazquez, Inc., et al
as 21-1059
Interested Party:
ANTONIO DIAZ BELGODERE, ANTONIO RIQUELME MUNIZ, MANUEL X. CRUZ RAMOS and others
Respondent:
EURO-JAPON AUTO SUPPLY, INC. and EMPRESAS VELAZQUEZ, INC., a single employer
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Juan Sanchez-Rivera v. Jorge Bribiesca, et al
as 20-55988
Defendant / Appellee:
SIXTO MARRERO, Facility Administrator, Imperial Regional Detention Facility, JOSE BUILTEMAN, Gang Intelligence Officer, Imperial Regional Detention Facility, ALEX PALACIOS, Deportation Officer, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN SANCHEZ-RIVERA
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Rivera et al
as 1:2020cv02938
Defendant:
The King of Tacos House, Inc., Juan F. Rivera, The King of Tacos House, Inc. doing business as The King of the Taco and others
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
USA v. Juan Rivera Arreola
as 20-40145
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN LUIS RIVERA ARREOLA, also known as Juan Arreola
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rivera-Lopes v. Barr
as 19-2513
Petitioner:
Juan Isac Rivera-Lopes, AKA Luis Idrovo Urgiles, AKA Mauricio Trelles
Respondent:
William P. Barr
USA v. Juan Rivera
as 19-50041
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS RIVERA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Andres Herrera-Segovia
as 18-11073
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDRES HERRERA-SEGOVIA, also known as Juan Velazquez-Rivera, also known as Jaime Garcia-Zapata
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
