Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Ocampo-Gomez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2989
Petitioner:
LORENA OCAMPO-GOMEZ, EMILY JULIET DELGADO-OCAMPO, JAQUELINE DELGADO-OCAMPO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Sariol v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2877
Plaintiff:
JULIET S. SARIOL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION
Tomas-Melchor, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2312
Petitioner:
ESMERALDA TOMAS-MELCHOR, ALEXIS CASTRO-TOMAS, THALIA CASTRO-TOMAS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jheinsiny Lopez-Flores, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1233
Petitioner:
JHEINSINY AREDI LOPEZ-FLORES, ADRIANA KATHERIN QUISPE-ADRIAN, LIONEL ANTHUAN LOPEZ-QUISPE and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Cai, et al. v. Eargo, Inc., et al.
as 23-3470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
XIAOBIN CAI and IBEW LOCAL 353 PENSION PLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
EARGO, INC., CHRISTIAN GORMSEN, ADAM LAPONIS and others
Letricia Brown v. State of California, et al
as 23-55813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LETRICIA LAVERN BROWN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Abaasa et al v. 3M Company et al
as MN/0:23-CV-02820
Plaintiff:
Dickson Abaasa, Alex Abaho, Asaph Abaho and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Acheampong v. Worden & Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02373
Plaintiff:
Juliet Acheampong
Defendant:
Worden & Associates, LLC, Joshua Samuel Mirel, Jarvis Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
