Cases 1 - 10 of 23
In re: Aceto Corporation Secur
as 21-955
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Bonine
Defendant / Appellee:
Rebecca A. Roof, Walter J. Kaczmarek, Frances P. Scally and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Mulligan, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and Jincai Yang
Defendant:
Aceto Corporation
RELIABLE PHARMACY et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06291
Defendant:
JAMES "JIM" GRAUSO, SANDOZ, INC., Mitchell Blashinsky and others
Plaintiff:
CHET JOHNSON DRUG, INC., RELIABLE PHARMACY, INC., RUSSELL'S MR. DISCOUNT DRUGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Michalow v. East Coast Restoration & Consu
as 20-3453
Defendant / Appellee:
Midtown Restoration, Inc., Grzegorz Sobolewski, Bozena Barbara Marcisquak and others
Plaintiff:
Dariusz Michalow, William Gonzalez, for themselves and others similarly situated who were employed by East Coast Restoration & Consulting Corp., Midtown Restoration, Inc., East Coast Installation & Consulting Corp., East Coast and Restoration & Construction Consulting and Sebastian Tkaczyk
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tomasz Helwing, Stainslaw Bis, Jozef Dudek and others
Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03539
Plaintiff:
State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, Commonwealth (of) Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
MALLINCKRODT PLC, ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, JOHN WESOLOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00802
Defendant:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Roger Lyles v. Darnell Jackson, et al
as 20-1042
Defendant / Appellee:
M. WALTERS, Quarter-Master supervisor, ROBERT KACZMAREK, Saginaw County Prosecutor, KATHLEEN DAVISON HUNTER, Assistant Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER L. LYLES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
