Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Jeffrey Mills, et al v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 23-15945
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEFFREY MILLS, GEORGE E. COLES, OLLIE L. BRYANT, Jr. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, JOSEPH BICK, DEAN BORDERS, Warden and others
USA v. Jermaine Walker
as 22-12969
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JERMAINE LEE WALKER
USA v. Eddie Walker
as 22-1857
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EDDIE LEE WALKER, also known as MIKE, also known as MO
USA v. Tommy Walker
as 21-10364
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TOMMY LEE WALKER
USA v. Tommy Walker
as 21-10365
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TOMMY LEE WALKER
Where Do We Go Berkeley, et al v. Caltrans, et al
as 21-16790
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WHERE DO WE GO BERKELEY, KEVIN CODDINGTON, JOSE MORFIN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TOKS OMISHAKIN, individually and in his official capacity ad Director of Caltrans and DINA EL-TAWANSY, individually and in her official capacity as Director of District Four
Banks v. City of Niagara Falls
as 21-257
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Debra V. Johnson, Cassandra Weeden-Cooper, Charles Byrd and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Occidental Chemical Corporation, City of Niagara Falls, Miller Springs Remediation Management, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Howard Walker, III
as 20-61160
Defendant / Appellant:
Howard Lee Walker, III
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00215
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
