Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Modeski, et al v. Summit Retail Solutions, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 20-1747
Plaintiff:
IIESHIA MEYERS, JEREMY WILLIAMS, ARIELLE MONEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GIOVANNI ZAMMITO, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees, NATHAN DAMBOISE, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees, JEFFREY WOLFERT, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SUMMIT RETAIL SOLUTIONS, INC.
Ronald Pierce, et al v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-17170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD PIERCE, KERRY HICKS, ANDREW KARRES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, California Chief Justice, Chair of Judicial Council and STEVEN JAHR, Administrative Director of the Administrative Office of the Courts
Pierce et al v. Cantil-Sakauye et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2013cv01295
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pierce , Kerry Hicks , Andrew Karres and others
Defendant:
Cantil-Sakauye and Steven Jahr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2012cv01727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.