Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Myers v. Stehlik et al
as 4:2022cv03039
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Myers
Defendant:
Galen Stehlik and Stehlik Law Firm
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00149
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Borges, Jr. v. Gurstel Law Firm, PC et al
as 8:2018cv00344
Plaintiff:
Tomas Borges, Jr.
Defendant:
Gurstel Law Firm, PC, Cavalry SPV I, LLC and Gurstel Chargo, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shanahan et al v. Lee Law Offices et al
as 8:2018cv00129
Plaintiff:
Molli M. Larsen and Timothy J. Shanahan, Jr.
Defendant:
Dennis P. Lee, Lee Law Offices and Jimmy Newton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2017mc03026
Defendant:
AMG Capital Management, LLC, AMG Services, Inc., Black Creek Capital Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Receiver:
Thomas McNamera
Rosales v. Lexington Law Firm
as 8:2017cv00087
Defendant:
Lexington Law Firm
Plaintiff:
Eugene Rosales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Telford et al v. United States of America et al DO NOT DOCKET FURTHER PLEADINGS PURSUANT TO ORDER 7
as 4:2016cv03147
Defendant:
Susan Aukema, Lea Bonnecaze, Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Fritts and Hollie Telford
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lundahl et al v. Hoffman et al
as 4:2016cv03000
Defendant:
Does 1-10 Inc., Glenna Gottfredson, Kristi Gould and others
303) 212-6888 (fax:
Holli Lundahl
307) 212-6888 (fax:
Logan Lundahl
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lundahl et al v. Dunn et al
as 4:2015cv03133
Defendant:
B J Brown, Craig Christensen, Lon Colton and others
307) 212-6888 (fax:
Logan Lundahl and Holli Telford
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.