Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tim Peterson v. Learfield Communications, LLC, et al
as 23-3773
Plaintiff:
Tim Peterson, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
Learfield Communications, LLC and Sidearm Sports, LLC
Emily Heerde et al v. Learfield Communications, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04493
Plaintiff:
Emily Heerde and Mark Haines
Defendant:
Learfield Communications, LLC, Sidearm Sports, LLC and University of Southern California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Peterson v. Learfield Communications, LLC. et al
as 8:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Tim Peterson
Defendant:
Learfield Communications, LLC, Sidearm Sports, LLC, University of Nebraska-Lincoln and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. The University of Texas at Austin et al
as 1:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Adam Brown
Defendant:
The University of Texas at Austin, The University of Texas at Austin Athletics, Learfield Communications, LLC and others
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EDWARDS et al v. THE UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC et al
as 1:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
AUDRA EDWARDS, DEREK EDWARDS, BRIAN STONEBRAKER and others
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, THE UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, THE UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
C10 Media LLC v. Learfield Communications, LLC
as 7:2022cv07377
Plaintiff:
C10 MEDIA LLC
Defendant:
LEARFIELD COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LEARFIELD COMMUNICATIONS, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00389
Defendant:
IMG COLLEGE, LLC, LEARFIELD COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and A-L TIER I LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Ronaldo Henderson v. Learfield Communications Inc et al
as 2:2017cv07162
Defendant:
DOES, Learfield Communications Inc and Learfield Communications LLC
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo Henderson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
