Cases 1 - 10 of 313
Ayers v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ayers
Defendant:
Quentin Blackford, Bruce G. Bodaken, Karen Ling and others
Comeau v. VinFast Auto Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv02750
Plaintiff:
Jeremie Comeau
Defendant:
VinFast Auto Ltd., Le Thi Thu Thuy, Pham Nhat Vuong and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Bai et al v. CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP et al
as 2:2024at00303
Plaintiff:
Shi Bai, Jing Cai, Yikun Cai and others
Defendant:
CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP, CMB Export LLC, NK Immigration Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bai et al v. CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP et al
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Shi Bai, Jing Cai, Yikun Cai and others
Defendant:
CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP, CMB Export LLC, NK Immigration Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nghiem v. Santa Clara University, et al.
as 24-521
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER P. NGHIEM
Defendant / Appellee:
SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY, NAM LING, GRACE LING and others
Bank of America, N.A. et al v. Jenzabar, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12684
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
Jenzabar, Inc., LING CHAI MAGINN, ROBERT MAGINN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dora et al v. Imago DEI Church et al
as 3:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
Ling Fongxu Dora and Dora FS Ling Cooper
Defendant:
Imago DEI Church, Re-Imagine 1.0 & 2.0, Refuse Ministries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
He, et al. v. Garland
as 23-1278
Petitioner:
LING HE and LONG HE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
