Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Marion County Sheriff, et al v. Michael Driver, et al
as 19-8021
Respondent:
MICHAEL BOYD, NICHOLAS SWORDS, ROY SHOFNER and others
Petitioner:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF and CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-10861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Michael Wheat
as 16-6816
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL BOYD WHEAT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Driver, et al v. Marion County Sheriff's Depar, et al
as 16-8024
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DRIVER, individually and as representatives of a class of all similarly situated individuals, TERRY CLAYTON, individually and as representatives of a class of all similarly situated individuals, MICHAEL BOYD, individually and as representatives of a class of all similarly situated individuals and others
Respondent:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY
Californians For Renewable Energy et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 4:2015cv03292
Plaintiff:
Californians For Renewable Energy , Ashurst Bar/Smith Community Organization , Citizens for Alternatives to Radioactive Dumping and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Gina McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Boyd v. FMS Investment Corp.
as 1:2012cv00048
Plaintiff:
Michael Boyd
Defendant:
FMS Investment Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Michael Wheat
as 09-6547
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL BOYD WHEAT
Boyd v. Baker
as 3:2009cv02202
Plaintiff:
Michael Boyd
Defendant:
Jaimie Baker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
