Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Fujinaga et al
as 3:2015mc00051
Defendant:
Edwin Yoshihiro Fujinaga, MRI International Inc and CSA Service Center LLC
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Fujinaga et al
as 1:2015mc00153
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Edwin Yoshihiro Fujinaga, MRI International, Inc., CSA Service, LLC and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Edwin Yoshihiro Fujinaga et al
as 2:2015mc00179
Defendant:
CSA Service Center, LLC, Edwin Yoshihiro Fujinaga and MRI International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Shige Takiguchi, et al. v. MRI International, Inc., et al.
as 2:2013mc00365
Defendant:
MRI International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shige Takiguchi
Shige Takiguchi et al v. MRI International Inc et al
as 2:2013mc00344
Defendant:
Does, Edwin J Fujinaga, LVT Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kaya Hatanaka, Hatsune Hatano, Yoko Hatano and others
Shige Takiguchi et al v. MRI International Inc et al
as 2:2013mc00345
Defendant:
Does, Edwin J Fujinaga, LVT Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kaya Hatanaka, Hatsune Hatano, Yoko Hatano and others
Shige Takiguchi et al v. MRI International Inc et al
as 2:2013mc00346
Defendant:
Does, Edwin J Fujinaga, LVT Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kaya Hatanaka, Hatsune Hatano, Yoko Hatano and others
Shige Takiguchi v. MRI International, Inc.
as 2:2013mc00327
Defendant:
MRI International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shige Takiguchi
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Fujinaga et al
as 2:2013cv01658
Defendant:
CSA Service Center, LLC, Edwin Yoshihiro Fujinaga and MRI International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud
MRI International, Inc. v. United States of America
as 2:2013mc00009
Petitioner:
MRI International, Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
