Cases 1 - 10 of 8,588
Williams v. Luna, et al.
as 24-3187
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SHERIFF LUNA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS and others
Sandoval et al v. Bosley et al
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Michelle Sandoval, Samuel Herrera, Arthur Martinez and others
Defendant:
John Bosley, Bosley Management, Inc, Santa Clara Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Flickinger v. Castillo et al
as 5:2024cv02915
Plaintiff:
Jason Archie Flickinger
Defendant:
Jaqueline Reyes Castillo, Robert Crisp, Pedro Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Carlos Martinez-Sanchez, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1905
Petitioner:
CARLOS ANDRES MARTINEZ-SANCHEZ, GLORIA VERONICA BERMESO-FERNANDEZ, C. S. M.-B. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CASTILLO v. USA
as 1:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
EFRAIN MARTINEZ CASTILLO
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Hernandez v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3007
Defendant:
J. STEENBERGEN, Medical Personnel at USP Victorville, individual, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL MANK, Former Doctor at USP Victorville and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO HERNANDEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Martinez-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-2966
Petitioner:
DANIEL SOLOMAN MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez-Alvarez v. Garland
as 24-1235
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO ANTONIO MARTINEZ-ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Villalta Martinez v. Garland
as 24-1222
Petitioner:
JOSE SAUL VILLALTA MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
