Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Toby Payne v. James Sutterfield, et al
as 20-10988
Defendant / Appellee:
Kevin D. Foley, Sr. Warden, Jason M. Hardegree, Major, Damon B. Andrews, Asst. Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Toby Kristopher Payne
Charles Talbert v. Correction Dental Associates, et al
as 20-2057
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. PATEL, DR. LISCO, DR. FOWLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES TALBERT
Joel Snider v. Robert Gilmore, et al
as 20-1981
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT GILMORE, ("Sec. Wetzel") is the Secretary of Corrections for the State of Pennsylvania's PA DOC, OFFICER MAHVASH SHEIKH, ("CO Adamson") is a Corrections Officer at SCI Greene, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, ("Dr. Pillai") is a psychiatrist serving at SCI Greene via Mental Health Management, Inc. (MHM) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL SNIDER
Joel Snider v. , et alIn re: Joel Snider v. , et al
as 19-3930
Not Yet Classified:
L.S. KERNS BARR, ("HEX Kerns-Barr") is a Hearing Examiner at SCI Greene, KERI MOORE, ("Asst. Chief Moore") is the Assistant Chief Grievance Coordinator for the PA DOC, BURRIS, ("Counselor Burris") is a Corrections Counselor at SCI Greene and others
Charles Talbert v. Correctional Dental Associates, et al
as 19-2369
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. PATEL, SIGY GEORGE, DR. FOWLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES TALBERT
Toby Payne v. Scott Appleton, et al
as 19-10601
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT APPLETON, Mental Health Counsler - Robertson Unit, FNU GARCIA, Psychiatrist - Clements Unit, FNU NGUYEN, Psychiatrist - Clements Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOBY KRISTOPHER PAYNE
Hockett et al v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00022
Plaintiff:
Debra Hockett, Linda Thompson, M.D., Chyrissa Staley and others
Defendant:
Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation, Indian Path Hospital, Inc., Horizon Mental Health Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
