Cases 1 - 10 of 13
USA v. Michael Dunn
as 23-14164
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL RISHARD DUNN
Michael Dunn v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 21-14239
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID DUNN
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Natural Land Institute v. The Greater Rockford Airport Authority et al
as 3:2021cv50410
Plaintiff:
Natural Land Institute
Defendant:
The Greater Rockford Airport Authority, The Greater Rockford Airport Authority Board of Commissioners, Michael P. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181
Michael Dunn v. County of Mendocino, et al
as 20-15415
Defendant / Appellee:
MENDOCINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, TOM ALLMAN, Sheriff and COUNTY OF MENDOCINO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ALLAN DUNN
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. NEM Inc.
as 19-1352
Defendant / Appellant:
NEM INC., d/b/a Sandy Monkey, WILLIAM J. MUSE and SHARON CUMBIE
Defendant:
GS THADIUS LLC, d/b/a The Bar and CHRISTIE MICHELLE ACOSTA, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Michael Jason Dunn
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
US v. Michael Dunn
as 17-4650
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL LAMAR DUNN
United States v. Dunn
as 13-4140
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL LOREN DUNN
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arias et al
as 2:2012cv02937
Defendant:
Bryan Arias, Hugo A. Arias, Anthony C. Ciccone and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Michael Dunn v. Kamala Harri
as 11-17704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALLAN DUNN
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA HARRIS
Kelly v. Abel et al
as 3:2011cv01178
Defendant:
Gregory E. Abel, Wedge Abels, Shane E. Abma and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
