Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Terkel et al v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al
as 6:2020cv00564
Defendant:
Director Robert R. Redfield, ActingChief of Staff Nina Witkofsky, Secretary Alex Azar and others
Plaintiff:
Lauren Terkel, Lufkin Creekside Apartments, Ltd., Lufkin Creekside Apartments II, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Ghist v. Intelemedia Premier Leads, LLC
as 4:2019cv00329
Plaintiff:
Nina Ghist
Defendant:
Intelemedia Communications and Intelemedia Premier Leads, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00880
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Rawlings et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Stanford, Daniel Walker, Sandra Rivero and others
Defendant:
VM Motori SpA, VM North America Inc, Robert Bosch GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02761
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
MetroPCS v. Thomas et al
as 3:2018mc00037
Plaintiff:
MetroPCS
Defendant:
Isaiah Michael Thomas, Zamir Jefferson, Christopher Alexander T Johnson and others
Respondent:
Jason Frazin
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Mogul Marketing, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv02527
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Mogul Marketing, LLC and Nina Yvette Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00792
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
