Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Miller et al v. Miller et al
as 4:2020cv00063
Plaintiff:
Louie E Coble and Jennifer L Miller
Defendant:
Monticello Police Department and Nathaneal C Miller
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IMO 2019 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2019mc00090
In Re:
Danuta B. Panich, Kenneth L. Sales, Scott J. Lennox and others
IMO 2018 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 1:2018mc00026
In Re:
Lauren Kathleen Griffin, Michael John Bellich, Thomas William Belleperche and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2018mc00038
Respondent:
ANDREW JOHN ALBRIGHT, MICHAEL EUGENE ALLEN, MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
MASTER INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION BOARD, INC. v. THORNBERRY
as 1:2018mc00031
Plaintiff:
MASTER INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION BOARD, INC.
Defendant:
PHILLIP NATHAN THORNBERRY
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00161
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
