Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nathan Daniel Clark v. Paul Schnell, et al
as 20-2436
Respondent / Appellee: Shannon Reimann, Warden and Paul Schnell, Minnesota Department of Corrections Commissioner
Petitioner / Appellant: Nathan Daniel Clark
Nathan Daniel Clark v. Paul Schnell
as 20-1617
Respondent: Paul Schnell, Minnesota Department of Corrections
Petitioner: Nathan Daniel Clark
Semaj Howard v. Robert Ranum, et al
as 20-15072
Plaintiff / Appellant: SEMAJ HOWARD
Defendant: ULISES DOMINGUEZ, Deputy, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, BRIAN PREHODA, Sergeant, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, DONNA COX, Sergeant, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department and others
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT RANUM, Deputy, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, CHRISTOPHER BARNEY, Deputy, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, NATHAN DANIEL, Deputy, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department and others
US v. Nathan Larson
as 12-5042
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: NATHAN DANIEL LARSON
US v. Nathan Branham
as 12-4797
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: NATHAN DANIEL BRANHAM
Nathan Daniel Clark v. Tom Roy
as 12-1601
Petitioner: Nathan Daniel Clark
Respondent: Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections
E. Scott Frison, Jr. v. Equifax Information Service
as 11-1034
Plaintiff - Appellant: E. SCOTT FRISON, JR. and LISA A. FRISON
Defendant - Appellee: EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, TRANS UNION LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant: EXPERIAN INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
US v. Nathan Larson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-4964
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: NATHAN DANIEL LARSON
Nathan Daniel Bassett
as 0:2009cr00327
Defendant: Nathan Daniel Bassett
Plaintiff: USA
USA v. Bassett et al
as 0:2009cr00327
Defendant: Nathan Daniel Bassett
Plaintiff: USA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?