Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Pramco II, LLC v. Sepulveda et al
as 1:2011mc00298
Plaintiff:
Pramco II, LLC
Defendant:
Rafael Rodriguez Sepulveda and Pura Vazquez Vazquez
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
In re: In Re: David Kissi, et al
as 09-3425
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: DAVID KISSI
Defendant - Respondent:
PRAMCO II, DLA PIPER, of MD and NY, VENABLE LLP, of MD and NY and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JOSEPH J. FARNAN, JR.
Pramco II, LLC v. David Kissi
as 09-1413
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, LLC, EMIL HIRSCH and O'CONNOR & HANNAN, LLP
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID M. KISSI, Individually and in his capacity as Co-Trustee of the Ammendale Living Trust
Defendant - None:
EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI and AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST
Respondent - None:
DAVID MUCHOW
Party-in-Interest - None:
CHRISTOPHER BOWMAR MEAD, RICHARD M. KREMEN, JOSE ANDRADE and others
Garnishee - None:
AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST
Movant - None:
MICHAEL PEARSON and BENNETT AND BAIR, LLP
David Kissi v. Pramco II, LLC, et al
as 08-57007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, LLC, DLA PIPER, VENABLE LLP and others
David Kissi et al v. Pramco II, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv07334
Plaintiff:
David Kissi
Defendant:
Pramco II, LLC, DLA Piper, Venable LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Pramco II, LLC v. David Kissi
as 08-1829
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, LLC, EMIL HIRSCH and O'CONNOR & HANNAN, LLP
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID M. KISSI, Individually and in his capacity as Co-Trustee of the Ammendale Living Trust
Defendant - None:
EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI, Individually and in her capacity as Co-Trustee of the Ammendale Living Trust and AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST
Party-in-Interest - None:
CHRISTOPHER BOWMAR MEAD, RICHARD M. KREMEN, JOSE ANDRADE and others
Respondent - None:
DAVID MUCHOW
Garnishee - None:
AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST
Movant - None:
MICHAEL PEARSON and BENNETT AND BAIR, LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
