Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00523
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00524
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mogan v. State Bar of California, et al.
as 24-3492
Plaintiff: MICHAEL MOGAN, ATTORNEY
Defendant: STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, GEORGE CARDONA, in his official capacity as Chief Trial Counsel For the State Bar of California, and in his individual capacity, CHRISTOPHER JAGARD, in his official capacity as Deputy Chief Trial Counsel for the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel and in his individual capacity and others
JOHNSTON v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC.
as 2:2024cv00516
Plaintiff: Patricia Johnston
Defendant: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC. and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Childers et al v. Life Protect 24/7, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01339
Plaintiff: Patricia Bailey Childers and Luqman Muhammad
Defendant: Life Protect 24/7, Inc. d/b/a Life Protect 24/7
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cal-Lopez v. Garland
as 24-3370
Petitioner: NANCY PATRICIA CAL-LOPEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00891
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: Patricia Lee Jackson
as 2:2024rd00031
Miranda Nava, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3365
Petitioner: PATRICIA MIRANDA NAVA, ELIXANDRO NARANJO MIRANDA, JULIAN NARANJO MIRANDA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11043
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?