Cases 1 - 10 of 493
Esdras De Paz-Diaz v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3455
Petitioner:
ESDRAS DE PAZ-DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Mi Familia Vota, et al. v. Petersen, et al.
as 24-3188
Plaintiff:
MI FAMILIA VOTA, VOTO LATINO, LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State, KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Intervenor:
WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Julio Paz-Escobar, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-11529
Petitioner:
JULIO EDUARDO PAZ-ESCOBAR, ZUNILDA LORIELA ERAZO-CASTRO and DYLAN EDUARDO PAZ-ERAZO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Paz Ramos v. Garland
as 24-2594
Petitioner:
EVER GEOVANY PAZ RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
De La Paz v. 2U, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11049
Plaintiff:
Henry De La Paz
Defendant:
2U, Inc. and edX, LLC
UC Solutions, LLC v. Shapiro
as 24-991
Plaintiff:
UC SOLUTIONS, LLC, GP TRADING PARTNERS, LLC and PROTECTIVE APPAREL, LLP
Defendant:
SAADIA SHAPIRO, VADIM LEYBEL, BORIS LEYBEL and others
Paz-Rosales, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2174
Petitioner:
JORGE AUGUSTO PAZ-ROSALES and JOSE AUGUSTO PAZ-CASTANON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Palacios-De Paz
as 24-50212
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Raul Palacios-De Paz, also known as Luis Antonio Roman, also known as Bulmaro Palacios-De Paz, also known as Raul Palacios
Paz-Galindo v. Garland
as 24-1534
Petitioner:
FERNANDO PAZ-GALINDO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Velasquez Murcia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1250
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN NAHUM VELASQUEZ MURCIA, TANIA ESTELA PAZ RIVERA and DANIELA NAZARET VELASQUEZ PAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
