Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00977
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bertoldo v. Vectrus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01399
Plaintiff: Marta Bertoldo
Defendant: Vectrus, Inc., Charles Prow, Louis J. Giuliano and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10 Securities Exchange Act
Coffman v. Vectrus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03098
Plaintiff: Catherine Coffman
Defendant: Vectrus, Inc., Charles Prow, Louis J. Giuliano and others
Harper v. Vectrus, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01146
Plaintiff: Adrienne Harper
Defendant: Vectrus, Inc., Charles Prow, Louis J. Giuliano and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Phillip Sanders v. Raybon Johnson
as 21-71280
Petitioner: PHILLIP C. SANDERS
Respondent: RAYBON C. JOHNSON, Warden
US v. Goodwin
as 21-1224
Defendant / Appellant: PHILLIP C. GOODWIN
Appellee: UNITED STATES
RAY v. SPORTSMAN'S WAREHOUSE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00967
Defendant: JON BARKER, JOSEPH P SCHNEIDER, CHRISTOPHER EASTLAND and others
Plaintiff: ARIAN RAY
Kubicek v. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00302
Defendant: Jon Barker, Gregory P. Hickey, Christopher Eastland and others
Plaintiff: Bryan Kubicek
Clarence Otworth v. Fifth Third Bank, et al
as 20-1286
Defendant / Appellee: PHILLIP C. BODLE, An individual, WILLIAM DUNCAN SCHUETTE, Former Michigan Attorney General, WILLIAMS & HUGHES, Law firm in Muskegon, MI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE MATTHEW OTWORTH
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Clarence Otworth v. Fifth Third Bank, et al
as 20-1156
Defendant / Appellee: PHILLIP C. BODLE, An individual, WILLIAM DUNCAN SCHUETTE, Former Michigan Attorney General, WILLIAMS & HUGHES, Law firm in Muskegon, MI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE MATTHEW OTWORTH
Type: Other Statutes RICO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?