Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Urmancheev v. Ndoh, et al.
as 24-3043
Plaintiff:
ALIM S. URMANCHEEV
Defendant:
R. NDOH, P. VERA, D GROVES and others
Michael Witkin v. Hagerman, et al
as 21-15345
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL AARON WITKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
R. BRIGGS, HAGERMAN, Sgt., R. COKER and others
Pedro Rodriguez v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 19-55125
Defendant / Appellee:
R. BRIGGS, Appeals Examiner, SCOTT KERNAN, CDCR Director and M. VOONG, Chief Office of Appeals
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO RODRIGUEZ
Luis Garces v. J. Pickett, et al
as 19-15081
Defendant / Appellee:
SCHAAKE, Correctional Officer at High Desert State Prison, S. L. CHAPMAN, Chief Deputy Warden at High Desert State Prison, L. LOPEZ, CCII at the Appeals Coordinator Office at HDSP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUIS MANUEL GARCES
Kenneth Johnson v. Neil McDowell, et al
as 19-55056
Defendant / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, R. BRIGGS, Third Level Review ("TLR") Appeal Examiner, Correctional Captain, official capacity, P. KELLER, Second Level Review(er) ("SLR"), Assoc. Govt. Pgrm. Analyst, official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE JOHNSON
Kenneth Wayne Johnson v. Neil McDowell et al
as 5:2017cv02054
Defendant:
R. Briggs, P. Keller, Neil McDowell and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Johnson
Briggs et al v. Craig Scott Capital,LLC et al
as 1:2015mc00146
Petitioner:
James R Briggs and Louisa B. Briggs
Respondent:
Craig Scott Capital,LLC, Brookstone Securites, Inc, David Charles Cannata and others
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Briggs et al v. Craig Scott Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2015mc00883
Plaintiff:
James R. Briggs and Louisa B. Briggs
Defendant:
Brookstone Securities, Inc., David Charles Cannata, Craig Scott Capital, LLC and others
Briggs et al v. Capital et al
as 1:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
James R. Briggs and Louisa B. Briggs
Defendant:
Craig Scott Capital, LLC, Craig Scott Taddonio and Brent Morgan Porges
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. ยง 9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
