Cases 1 - 10 of 17
USA v. Robert Carter
as 23-3413
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT E. CARTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55587
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Asher Hill v. Dennis Meyer, et al
as 21-2884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHER B. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
DENNIS MEYER, Doctor, RUTHIE JIMERSON, KIM HOBSON and others
John A. Hawkins v. Robert E. Carter, Jr., et al
as 21-2228
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN A. HAWKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., RON NEAL, CAPTAIN BOOTZ and others
Donald Jackson v. Robert Carter, et al
as 21-1711
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. SMITH, NEAL FETZ, KEITH BUTTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD L. JACKSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00704
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Yusuf Hotep-El v. Robert Carter, et al
as 21-1376
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent, T. HARTZELL, Deputy Warden of Putnamville Correctional Facility, ROBERT E. CARTER, Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL, also known as JOSEPH DUWAYNE TUNSTILL
Jeffrey Rowe v. Dawn Buss, et al
as 21-1182
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Corrections, sued solely for injunctive relief and DAWN BUSS, Assistant Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY A. ROWE
Dustin Trowbridge v. Indiana Department of Correcti, et al
as 20-3314
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., Commissioner, RICHARD BROWN, Superintendent, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUSTIN TROWBRIDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
