Cases 1 - 10 of 2,343
Murphy et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 8:2024cv02165
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, Rena Bitter, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Elizabeth Sanchez Cervantes and Burt James Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Murphy et al v. Blinken et al
as 8:2024cv02169
Defendant:
Rafael Foley, John Doe, ANTONY J. BLINKEN and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Elizabeth Sanchez Cervantes and Burt James Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. Higuerey et al
as 3:2024cv01423
Defendant:
377 Ferrer, LLC, Valerie Cintron-Concepcion, La Terraza de San Juan and others
Plaintiff:
Randa Johnson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jared Ryan Milgrim v. Ventura County et al
as 2:2024cv07949
Defendant:
Aiden Ebrahim, Deputy Javier Chavez, Deputy McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Ryan Milgrim
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cruz Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4767
Petitioner:
JAIME MENDOZA CRUZ, JASON RAFAEL MENDOZA CRUZ, NANCY ZULEYMA CRUZ LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Branch (Munoz)
as 24-1987
Defendant:
YACKEEM MCFARLANE, ALLEN COLON, FAHEEM TAYLOR and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mukamal v. Ofer et al
as 1:2024cv22803
Defendant:
Roniel Rodriguez, IV, Raziel Ofer, Ajar Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Barry E. Mukamal
Cross-Complainant:
Raziel Ofer
Cross-Defendant:
Ajar Holdings, LLC, Zodiac Capital LLC, Drexel Financial LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Perez-Mendez v. Garland
as 24-4229
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
RAFAEL PEREZ-MENDEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
