Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 784
United States of America v. Robles
as 24-2809
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RICARDO ROBLES
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant: BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff: SAGE EL
Dai et al v. SAS Institute Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02537
Plaintiff: Hanson Dai, Max Chiswick, Adolph Robles and others
Defendant: SAS Institute Inc., Ideas Inc., Choice Hotels International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Nereida Millan Alonso, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1665
Petitioner: Nereida Millan Alonso and Andrea Robles Millan
Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Robles Morales v. Garland
as 24-1821
Petitioner: ROBERTO ROBLES MORALES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Encinas-Solano v. United States Customs and Border Protection, et al.
as 24-1642
Plaintiff: MARIA ISELA ENCINAS-SOLANO
Defendant: UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Federal Boder Patrol Agents, ARTURO ACOSTA, MANNY ROBLES and others
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff: FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant: CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 24-1419
Plaintiff: EMPIRE FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: JOSE A. RODRIGUEZ, JOSE LUIS TELLO-ROBLES, NICOLE ELYSE BROOKS and others
Reyes-Robles, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1378
Petitioner: ALONDRA REYES-ROBLES, RIGOBERTO MARTINEZ-GRANDE, EITHAN RIGOBERTO MARTINEZ-REYES and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Robles Hernandez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-831
Petitioner: LEONEL ADALBERTO ROBLES HERNANDEZ, JESSICA CAROLINA HERRERA HERRERA and DARLIN LEONEL ROBLES HERRERA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?