Cases 1 - 10 of 1,033
US v. Reyes-Rosario
as 24-1504
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
CARLOS J. REYES-ROSARIO, a/k/a Carlitos Mea, a/k/a El Mea, a/k/a Apestoso
Bac-Coc, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3302
Petitioner:
MARLEN ROSARIO BAC-COC and EZRB A JUVENILE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alas Gomez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3276
Petitioner:
FATIMA DEL ROSARIO ALAS GOMEZ and AXEL ALESSANDRO MONGE ALAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Del Rosario Rojas, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2732
Plaintiff:
EVELYN DEL ROSARIO ROJAS and J. ASUNCION ROJAS BAUTISTA
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Pamatz Valencia, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2658
Plaintiff:
LEONILA ROSARIO PAMATZ VALENCIA and JOSE BELEN RECENDIZ ARREOLA
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Hoglan et al v. Soulas et al
as 1:2024mc21627
Plaintiff:
Candyce S Hoglan, Kui Liong Lee, Kiu Liong Lee and others
Defendant:
Nicole Soulas, Frederick Soulas and Jordan Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hoglan et al v. M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657 et al
as 1:2024mc21628
Plaintiff:
Ju-Hsiu Jian, Jason Ruben Moreno, Christian B Stallworth and others
Defendant:
M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657, M/V Boceanica, IMO Number 9267132, M/V B Luminosa, IMO Number 9256016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Warren v. Nanos, et al.
as 24-2601
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY LEE WARREN
Defendant:
CHRIS NANOS, Sheriff, LAURA CONOVER, County Attorney, SAMANTHA WALKER, CES Dut and others
US v. Iza Rosario-Cruzado
as 24-6365
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
IZA MAR ROSARIO-CRUZADO
Berg, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2433
Respondent:
KRIZIA BERG, GRACE BRYANT, NOELANI DEL ROSARIO-SABET and others
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity and ALEX VILLANUEVA, Sheriff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
