Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Lindsey Wampler, et al v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co, et al
as 09-50208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDSEY WAMPLER and MICHAEL PEACOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO, doing business as AT&T Southwest, doing business as AT&T Datacomm, doing business as AT&T Texas, doing business as SBC Advanced Solutions, Inc, SBC ADVANCED SOLUTIONS, INC, doing business as AT&T Advanced Solutions, AT&T, INC. and others
Wampler et al v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company et al
as 1:2007cv01039
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Wampler, Lindsey Wampler, Lindsey Wampler and others
Defendant:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, SBC Advanced Solutions, Inc., AT&T, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America v. Gaw et al
as 3:2007cv01242
Plaintiff:
United States of America and All Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Steve Gaw, Robert M. Clayton, III, Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Clayton et al v. AT&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01187
Plaintiff:
Robert Clayton and Steve Gaw
Defendant:
AT&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc., AT&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc., AT&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
linkLine, et al v. SBC California, Inc., et al
as 05-56023
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LINKLINE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., INREACH INTERNET LLC, OM NETWORKS, dba Omsoft Technologies, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SBC CALIFORNIA, INC., fka Pacific Bell Telephone Company, PACIFIC BELL INTERNET SERVICES and SBC ADVANCED SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Amicu:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Stein v. Pacific Bell, et al
as 3:2000cv02915
Plaintiff:
Albert O. Stein
Defendant:
SBC Technology Resources, Inc., Pacific Bell, SBC Communications, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
