Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Vanness, et al. v. Aguilar, et al.
as 24-2910
Plaintiff:
SUSAN VANNESS, ALEXANDREA SLACK, MARTIN WALDMAN and others
Defendant:
FRANCISCO V. AGUILAR, in his official capacity as Nevada Secretary of State and JOSEPH LOMBARDO, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Nevadaa
Slack v. Jinkens, et al.
as 24-2592
Plaintiff:
TOMMIE SLACK
Defendant:
W. JINKENS, Chaplain at Benton County Correction, JENNIFER LNU, Chaplain at Benton County Correction, COMBS, Lieutenant at Benton County Correction and others
United States of America v. Slack
as 24-2404
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TOMMIE SLACK
Clark v. State of Connecticut
as 23-8105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GORDON CLARK, -, in his individual capacity, in his capacities as husband, sole fiduciary, sole beneficiary, and sole creditor of the Estate of Lillian J. Clark
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT, Office of Governor NED LAMONT, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Campbell v. Clark County Courthouse
as 2:2023cv00150
Petitioner:
Latosha McIntyre Slack Campbell
Respondent:
Clark County Courthouse
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In re Application of 2770095 Ontario, Inc.
as 3:2022mc80009
Plaintiff:
2770095 Ontario, Inc.
Defendant:
Slack Technologies, Inc.
USA v. Adam Stargazer
as 21-10282
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM STARGAZER, AKA Damon Alexander Grey, AKA Dale Richard Slack
Wilson v. W.R. Grace & Co. et al
as 1:2021cv01264
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
W.R. Grace & Co., Hudson La Force, Mark E. Tomkins and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
