Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Henson v. United States Probation Office of the Northern District of Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv01639
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Todd Henson, Sr
Defendant:
United States Probation Office of the Northern District of Alabama, Brooke Cobb, Alicia Spings and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) (findings & purpose)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Garrison v. Medicredit, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00346
Defendant:
Medicredit, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Roger Garrison, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Heard v. Director, Office of Information Policy, et al. (MAG+)
as 2:2021cv00125
Defendant:
Louis Vinson Franklin, Sr. and Director, Office of Information Policy
Plaintiff:
Freddie Demond Heard
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Pierce v. NewRez, LLC
as 1:2021cv00068
Defendant:
NewRez, LLC doing business as Shellpoint
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Pierce, Sr
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Valentino v. Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2020cv02053
Plaintiff:
Spero Valentino, Sr
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Schambeau v. Schambeau et al
as 1:2020cv00436
Defendant:
Warren A. Schambeau, Sr., Sue G. Schambeau, Stone Crosby, PC and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Anthony Schambeau
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
