Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Golubowski v. Robinhood Markets, Inc., et al.
as 24-1036
Plaintiff:
PHILIP GOLUBOWSKI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
ROBINHOOD MARKETS, INC., BAIJU BHATT, JAN HAMMER and others
Other:
VINOD SODHA and AMEE SODHA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lian v. Tuya Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06792
Plaintiff:
Xiaomeng Lian
Defendant:
Tuya Inc., Xueji (Jerry) Wang, Liaohan (Leo) Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
USA v. Du Pont
as 22-20098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company and Kenneth J. Sandel
Sandel v. Aztec Well Servicing, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00981
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wayne Sandel
Defendant:
Aztec Well Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Zito v. Tenev et al
as 1:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Robert Zito
Defendant:
Vladimir Tenev, Baiju Bhatt, Jan Hammer and others
Nominal Defendant:
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Golubowski v. Robinhood Markets, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv09767
Plaintiff:
Philip Golubowski
Defendant:
Robinhood Markets, Inc., Vladimir Tenev, Jason Warnick and others
Petitioner:
Felix Maechler, Leroy Doug Altman, Josh Raborn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
United States v. Mark Sandell
as 21-1511
Defendant / Appellant:
Mark Fredrick Sandell
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Sandel v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv00343
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Simche Sandel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00950
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
